2 min read
Separating capital costs from working capital needs
A new location typically involves two categories of cost that are often conflated. Capital expenditure covers fit-out, equipment, signage, IT infrastructure, and any lease premium or dilapidations deposit. Working capital covers payroll, stock, and operating expenses during the ramp-up period before the new site generates sufficient revenue to cover its own costs.
Funding these two categories from the same pot — or worse, from operating cash flow alone — creates avoidable pressure. The appropriate approach is to fund capex through a term loan or asset finance with a repayment schedule aligned to the expected life of the assets, and to fund the working capital gap through a revolving facility or an extension to an existing invoice finance arrangement.
Modelling the ramp-up period
Most businesses take six to eighteen months before a new site covers its own fixed costs. Directors who underestimate this window take on commitments — lease, staff contracts, fit-out loan repayments — that they cannot service from the new location alone, putting pressure on the profitable existing business to cross-subsidise. The model should include a conservative, base, and optimistic scenario for revenue ramp, with cash flow implications for each.
Lenders who specialise in multi-site or expansion lending will expect to see this modelling. A well-constructed three-scenario cash flow is both a lending requirement and a management discipline — it forces directors to identify the point at which the expansion would need to be aborted if the conservative scenario materialised.
Lease considerations and lender security
A commercial lease creates a long-term liability that affects the company's balance sheet and may affect its borrowing capacity for other facilities. Under IFRS 16, leases above a de minimis threshold are recognised on the balance sheet — confirm the accounting treatment with your accountant before signing. Some lenders take a fixed charge over the lease interest as security; others prefer a personal guarantee from directors.
Where the company holds significant assets — equipment, vehicles, stock — a debenture over those assets may provide an alternative or supplementary security base. The structuring of security is negotiable and worth discussing with a commercial lender early in the process, before the lease is signed and the negotiating position weakens.
Sequencing the funding before committing to the site
The most common mistake directors make when opening a second location is signing the lease before the funding is confirmed. Lease obligations become legally binding immediately; finance approvals take weeks and sometimes months. A commercial term sheet should be in hand before heads of terms are exchanged on the property.
Engaging a commercial lender at the planning stage — before site selection is finalised — also allows the lender's due diligence to inform the business case. A lender experienced in multi-site businesses may surface risks or structure suggestions that materially affect the viability of the expansion.
Frequently asked questions
Can the existing business's assets be used as security for a second-site loan?
Yes, in many cases. A lender may take a charge over the trading company's assets — debtors, stock, equipment — to support a facility that funds expansion. The terms depend on the quality and liquidity of those assets. Discuss the security structure with the lender before applying.
Should the second location be set up as a separate legal entity?
This is a question for your accountant and solicitor, as there are tax, liability, and operational implications either way. Some groups prefer a subsidiary structure for ring-fencing; others trade all locations within a single company. Funding structures are available for both approaches.
Funding for UK limited companies
Credicorp lends to your company, not to you personally — short-term working capital with no personal guarantee. See what your business could access.